Thursday, January 26, 2017

U.S. federal judge throws out VirnetX’s US$625.6 million verdict in Apple Inc patent infringement case



A federal judge has thrown out a verdict requiring Apple Inc to pay VirnetX retaining Corp US$625.6 million for infringing four patents regarding internet safety generation, causing VirnetX’s percentage rate to plunge.
VirnetX stocks have been down US$1.93, or forty four.6 per cent, at US$2.forty in Monday morning trading, after earlier falling to US$2.14.
In a selection past due Friday, U.S. District choose Robert Schroeder in Tyler, Texas said it was unfair to Apple that  VirnetX proceedings had been combined right into a single trial.
He stated jurors may also had been confused by greater than 50 references to the sooner case, though it contained “highly similar” troubles, and deferred improperly to the previous jury’s findings while it discovered Apple’s chargeable for willful infringement.
 “The repeated references to the previous jury verdict in the consolidated case led to an unfair trial,” Schroeder wrote.
He ordered that both cases be retried one by one, with the first trial beginning on Sept. 26.
VirnetX is a Zephyr Cove, Nevada-based totally organisation that derives most of its sales from licensing patents.
It accused Cupertino, California-based totally Apple of infringing patents utilized in merchandise consisting of FaceTime and iMessage.
america$625.6 million verdict introduced in February was one of the highest in a U.S. patent case.
“we're disenchanted,” VirnetX chief executive Kendall Larsen stated in a announcement on Monday. “we are reviewing all our alternatives and could comply with the court docket’s direction as we begin preparing for those retrials.”
Apple did no longer without delay respond to a request for remark.
Many patent cases are treated within the Texas court docket, which has a recognition for awarding favourable verdicts to plaintiffs alleging infringement.
VirnetX have been assigned the four patents via technological know-how programs international Corp in 2006, court papers show.

No comments:

Post a Comment