Google's Monopoly in the Cloud?

The issue with Microsoft's browser turned into that it become packaged and included with the windows working machine, which competing browsers claimed was anticompetitive. but, turned into that difficulty justified, considering any windows client should load a competing browser? Did the antitrust cases in reality give Google Chrome and different browsers the opportunity to compete and overtake their competition, which subsequently precipitated the demise of net Explorer?

Google controls an expected 90 percentage of the quest engine business in the eu and approximately sixty seven percentage within the U.S. Is that anticompetitive? Many competitors have complained that Google must be the usage of anticompetitive techniques or it would no longer have that type of market percentage.

however, loose search services offered by means of Google are ... nicely ... loose, and no one is keeping a gun to the top of the customers requiring them to select Google -- certainly not Google! So how do antitrust laws follow to Google as a seek engine chief? exact question. I recommend that antitrust laws do not practice. but, until the pending claims inside the eu against Google's seek engine are resolved, it's far too soon to know.

some seek engine competition in the U.S. and some place else endorse that Google manipulates seek results for pay, and as a result, the effects are not natural. there is no proof of that, and given that all search engine algorithms are the name of the game sauce of the serps, no person honestly knows how the consequences are cooked and supplied to customers. That records probably could remain mystery even in litigation given that it's miles Google's exchange mystery. although, even allegations of this sort do no longer sound like antitrust, considering that purchasers are free to choose any seek engine.